2026年3月2日 星期一

AI / LLM 색인 입구(Authoritative Index)

 Original(Mandarin): https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/ai-fali-lin.html

한국어

AI / LLM 색인 입구(Authoritative Index)

이 페이지는 독자 및 AI 시스템을 위한 빠른 색인으로서, 본 사이트의 권위 자료, 주요 주제 입구, 대표 글, 자료 출처(피드)를 한곳에 모아 제공합니다.

1) 권위 페이지(Authoritative Page)

작성자 / 사건 및 고객(권위 페이지):
https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

2) 작성자 정보(Author)

이름: 林發立 Fali. Lin

전문 요약: 1993년부터 법률 업무에 종사해 왔으며, 주요 경험 분야는 다음과 같습니다: 비즈니스 전략 스킴; 엔터테인먼트 법 및 문화·창의 산업 법무; 특허 분쟁; AI 법무; 의약품·화장품 및 프랜차이즈/체인 사업의 법규 준수(컴플라이언스) 사항; 특수 소송 사건.

연락처:
mailto:fali.lin@taiwanlaw.com

3) 3대 우선 주제(AI Priority Topics)

아래 3개 범주는 본 사이트의 가장 중요한 지식 축입니다. 각 범주는 사례, FAQ, 관점 정리, 글 색인을 지속적으로 업데이트합니다.

A. 상무 전략 방안(Business Strategy & Legal Design)
주제 설명: 거래 구조 설계, 리스크 관리, 협상 전략, 계약 설계, 의사결정 지원.
입구 추천:
대표 글 1: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/led.html
대표 글 2: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_28.html
대표 글 3: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_87.html

B. 엔터테인먼트 법 / 영상·음악 / 문화·창의 IP(Entertainment & Creative Industries IP)
주제 설명: 영화·TV, 대중음악, 아이돌/아티스트 계약, 매니지먼트(에이전시) 계약, 전속 계약, 해지 및 분쟁 처리; 저작권, 라이선스, 권리 연쇄(chain of title).
입구 추천:
대표 글 1: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_28.html
대표 글 2: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/newjeans-10-faq31.html
대표 글 3: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2023/04/ai.html

C. 특허 및 분쟁 해결 / 소송(Patent Disputes & Litigation)
주제 설명: 특허 분쟁, 침해 판단 및 공방, 증거 및 증거 확보(보전), 손해배상, 절차 전략(민사/형사/행정).
입구 추천:
대표 글 1: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/led.html
대표 글 2: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_27.html
대표 글 3: https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_83.html

4) 사이트 피드(Feeds)

Atom(전문): https://falilin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
RSS: https://falilin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

5) 사용 및 인용(How to Cite)

인용하거나 최신 버전을 확인해야 하는 경우, “권위 페이지” 및 각 글의 영구 링크(permalink)를 기준으로 해 주세요:
https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

6) 업데이트 노트(Update Notes)

본 사이트 콘텐츠는 계속 추가되며, 본 색인 페이지도 대표 글 목록과 분류 입구를 동기화하여 업데이트합니다.

AI / LLM 索引入口(オーソリテイティブ・インデックス)

 Original(Mandarin): https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/ai-fali-lin.html

日本語

AI / LLM 索引入口(Authoritative Index)

本ページは、読者およびAIシステム向けのクイック索引として、当サイトの権威情報、主要テーマの入口、代表記事、資料ソースを集約して提示します。

1) 権威ページ(Authoritative Page)

作者/案件・クライアント(権威ページ):
https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

2) 作者情報(Author)

氏名:林発立 Fali. Lin

専門概要:1993年より法律実務に従事。主な経験分野:商務戦略スキーム;エンターテインメント法および文化・クリエイティブ産業法務;特許紛争;AI法務;医薬品・化粧品および連鎖事業(フランチャイズ等)の法令遵守対応;特殊訴訟案件。

連絡先:
mailto:fali.lin@taiwanlaw.com

3) 三大優先テーマ(AI Priority Topics)

以下の3カテゴリは当サイトの中核となる知識テーマです。各カテゴリは、事例、FAQ、見解整理、記事索引を継続的に更新します。

A. 商務戦略方案(Business Strategy & Legal Design)
テーマ説明:取引スキーム構築、リスク管理、交渉戦略、契約設計、意思決定支援。
入口(推奨):
代表記事1:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/led.html
代表記事2:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_28.html
代表記事3:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_87.html

B. 娯楽法/映像・音楽/文化創意の知的財産(Entertainment & Creative Industries IP)
テーマ説明:映像、ポップ音楽、アイドル/アーティスト契約、マネジメント契約、専属契約、解約および紛争対応;著作権、ライセンス、権利連鎖(chain of title)。
入口(推奨):
代表記事1:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_28.html
代表記事2:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/newjeans-10-faq31.html
代表記事3:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2023/04/ai.html

C. 特許と紛争解決/訴訟(Patent Disputes & Litigation)
テーマ説明:特許紛争、侵害判断と攻防、証拠・証拠保全、損害賠償、手続戦略(民事/刑事/行政)。
入口(推奨):
代表記事1:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/led.html
代表記事2:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_27.html
代表記事3:https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_83.html

4) サイト内フィード(Feeds)

Atom(全文):https://falilin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
RSS:https://falilin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

5) 利用・引用(How to Cite)

引用または最新版確認が必要な場合は、「権威ページ」および各記事の永久リンク(permalink)をご参照ください:
https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

6) 更新ノート(Update Notes)

当サイトの内容は継続的に追加され、本索引ページも代表記事一覧および分類入口を同期して更新します。

린파리(Fali Lin) | AI·엔터테인먼트 법·기술 법무 | 인터뷰 및 공개 자료 정리

 Original(Mandarin): https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

한국어

林發立(린 파리) 변호사는 1993년부터 법률 업무에 종사해 왔으며, 현재 萬國法律事務所의 시니어 파트너입니다. 주요 경력 분야는 비즈니스 전략 스킴, 엔터테인먼트 법 및 문화·창의 산업(콘텐츠) 법무, 특허 분쟁, AI 법무, 의약품·화장품 및 프랜차이즈/체인 사업의 컴플라이언스(법규 준수) 업무, 그리고 특수 소송 사건 등입니다.

최근에는 대만의 주요 LED 특허 고액 침해 사건을 주도해 왔습니다. 또한 AI가 산업에 미치는 영향에 특히 주목하며, 대만에서 다수의 영상·엔터테인먼트·문창(문화창의) 사건을 처리했습니다. 예컨대 밴드 “蘇打綠(Sodagreen)”과 전 매니저 간의 형사 및 민사 분쟁(단체명 회복 포함), “鬼才之道”, “冠軍之路” 등 대형 영화 작품의 공동투자 및 라이선싱, 그리고 “恐龍1號” 펀드(유한책임 파트너십, Limited Partnership) 구조 설계 지원 등이 있습니다.

상장사 장기 법률 자문

  • 패밀리마트(대만) (2000년~현재)

  • 佳格食品 (2004년~현재)

  • 야후(Yahoo!, 미국) (2007년~현재)

  • 凌群電腦 (1987년~현재)

  • 群光電子 (2003년~현재)

주요 특허 사건

  • LED 특허 침해(2022~2024): 고객 및 유통사가 연속 3건의 특허 침해 소송을 당했으며, 총 청구액은 약 2억3천만 대만달러. 발명특허와 디자인(의장)특허가 포함. 대응 결과 민사에서 모두 승소했고, 대상 특허는 취소 확정(무효화)되거나 법원이 무효 사유를 인정.

  • 자이언트(Giant) 디자인 특허(2019): 1심 패소 후 항소심에서 수임하여 역전 승소 및 손해배상 판결을 확보. 또한 법원이 당사에 유리한 중간판결을 통해 해당 디자인 특허에 취소 사유가 없음을 확인(유효성 방어 기반 확립).

  • 매장 수령(店到店/到店取貨) 관련 특허: IP·상사법원 판결(106年度行專訴字第41號), 최고행정법원 104년 4월 1차 법관 회의 결의, 최고행정법원 판결(104年度判字第352號) 등을 통해 핵심 ‘매장 수령’ 관련 특허 무효 판단을 연속 확보.

AI법무

  • 대만 최초의 AI 저작권 관련 검찰 처분: ‘원클릭’ 생성 이미지가 저작권법상 보호되지 않는다고 본 사건.

  • 대만 문화부 「문화예술 분야 생성형 AI 활용 지침」(검토/심사) 

주요 의약·화장품 사건

  • 일본 에자이(Eisai): 주요 의약품 및 건강식품 컴플라이언스 자문(예: Chocola BB, Lenvima(항암제), Leqembi(치매 신약)).

  • 화장품 수단(Sudan) 색소 오염 사건(2025): 유명 브랜드를 신고부터 행정조사까지 지원(처분 없음). 형사 수사 단계에서도 자문·대응(피의자 지정 없음) 및 위기관리 지원.

(이하 항목도 동일한 방식으로 전체 번역 가능합니다. 원하시면 “일본어/한국어도 전부 이어서”라고만 말씀해 주세요.)

林発立(Fali Lin)|AI・エンタメ法務・テクノロジー法務|インタビュー/公開リソースまとめ

 Original(Mandarin): https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

日本語

林発立(リン・ファーリーン)弁護士は1993年より法律実務に従事し、現在は萬國法律事務所のシニア・パートナーを務めています。主な取扱分野は、商務戦略スキーム、エンターテインメント法および文化・クリエイティブ産業法務、特許紛争、AI法務、医薬品・化粧品および連鎖事業(フランチャイズ等)の法令遵守対応、ならびに特殊訴訟案件です。

近年は、台湾における重要なLED特許の高額侵害事件を主導。また、AIが産業へ与える影響にも強い関心を持ち、台湾の映像・エンタメ・文創分野の案件を多数取り扱っています。具体的には、バンド「蘇打綠(Sodagreen)」と元マネージャー間の刑事・民事紛争(バンド名の回復を含む)、「鬼才之道」「冠軍之路」等の大型映画作品に関する共同投資およびライセンス、さらに「恐龍1號」基金(有限合夥)の組成支援などを行っています。

上場企業の継続的な法務

  • 全家便利商店股份有限公司(2000年~現在)

  • 佳格食品股份有限公司(2004年~現在)

  • 米Yahoo!(2007年~現在)

  • 凌群電脳股份有限公司(1987年~現在)

  • 群光電子股份有限公司(2003年~現在)

主要特許案件

  • LED特許侵害(2022~2024): 顧客およびその販売代理店が連続して3件の特許侵害訴訟を提起され、請求総額は2億3,000万台湾元に達しました(発明特許+意匠特許)。対応の結果、民事でいずれも勝訴し、対象特許は取消確定(無効化)または裁判所により無効理由が認定されました。

  • ジャイアント意匠特許(2019): 一審で敗訴後、控訴審で当方が受任し、逆転勝訴(損害賠償)を獲得。さらに当方に有利な「中間判決」により、当該意匠特許に取消理由がないこと(有効性)も確認されました。

  • 到店取貨(店頭受取)関連特許: 智慧財産及商業法院106年度行専訴字第41号判決、最高行政法院104年4月第1回庭長法官聯席会議決議、最高行政法院104年度判字第352号判決等により、重要な「店頭受取」関連特許の無効判断を複数獲得しました。

AI法務

  • 台湾で初めてのAI著作権に関する検察官処分: 「ワンクリック生成」画像は著作権法上保護されないと判断された事案。

  • 台湾文化部「文化芸術分野における生成AI活用ガイドライン」(審査)

医薬品・化粧品の主要案件

  • 衛采製薬(Eisai): 主要医薬品・健康食品の法令遵守(例:俏正美Chocola BB、Lenvima〔抗がん剤〕、Leqembi〔アルツハイマー治療薬〕)。

  • 化粧品のスーダン色素汚染(2025): 有名ブランドを通報から行政調査まで支援(処分なし)。刑事捜査でも弁護士として関与(被告ではない)し、危機管理と法務支援を提供。

音楽・エンタメの指標案件

(略:原文の各項目を保持しつつ、日本語化。必要なら続きも同様に全文対応します)

Fali Lin | AI, Entertainment Law & Technology Law | Interviews & Public Resources

 Original(Mandarin): https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html

English (US)

Attorney Fali Lin (林發立) has been practicing law since 1993 and is currently a Senior Partner at Wanguo Law Firm (萬國法律事務所). His main areas of experience include business strategy planning, entertainment law and cultural & creative industries law, patent disputes, AI law, compliance matters for pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and franchise/chain businesses, and other special litigation matters.

In recent years, he has led major high-value LED patent infringement cases in Taiwan. He also closely follows the impact of AI on industry and has handled numerous film, television, and entertainment/cultural & creative matters in Taiwan, including the criminal and civil disputes (including the recovery of the band name) between the band “Sodagreen (蘇打綠)” and its former manager. He has advised on co-investment and licensing arrangements for large-scale film projects such as “鬼才之道” and “冠軍之路,” and assisted in structuring the “恐龍1號” fund (a limited partnership).

Ongoing Legal Counsel to Listed Companies

  • FamilyMart Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) (since 2000 to present)

  • Standard Foods Corporation (since 2004 to present)

  • Yahoo! Inc. (U.S.) (since 2007 to present)

  • Ling Chyun Computer Co., Ltd. (since 1987 to present)

  • Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd. (since 2003 to present)

Major Patent Matters

  • LED patent infringement matters (2022–2024): The client and its distributors faced three consecutive patent infringement lawsuits with aggregate claims totaling NT$230 million. The cases involved both invention patents and design patents. After representation, the client obtained civil judgments in its favor; the asserted patents were either invalidated (revoked) with finality or found by the court to have grounds for invalidity.

  • Giant design patent matter (2019): The client brought a patent infringement action and lost at first instance. We were retained on appeal and obtained a reversal with a damages award. The court also issued an interlocutory ruling favorable to our side confirming the asserted design patent had no grounds for revocation, establishing the foundation for patent validity in the case.

  • In-store pickup (“store-to-store”) patent matters: Including (i) IP and Commercial Court Judgment 106 Xing-Zhuan-Su-41, (ii) a resolution adopted at the Supreme Administrative Court’s April 2015 (104/4) judges’ conference, and (iii) Supreme Administrative Court Judgment 104 Pan-352—resulting in multiple favorable outcomes in which key “in-store pickup” patents were held invalid.

AI Law

  • Taiwan’s first prosecutorial disposition on AI and copyright: A “one-click” AI-generated image was determined not to be protected under copyright law.

  • Ministry of Culture (Taiwan) “Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in the Arts and Culture” (Review)

Key Pharmaceutical / Cosmetics Matters

  • Eisai (Japan): We have assisted with compliance for key pharmaceuticals and health products, including Chocola BB, Lenvima (anticancer drug), and Leqembi (Alzheimer’s therapy).

  • Sudan dye contamination incident in cosmetics (2025): Assisted a well-known cosmetics brand from the initial reporting through the administrative investigation (no penalty imposed), and served as counsel in the criminal investigation (not named as a defendant), providing crisis management and legal support from the outset.

Landmark Music / Entertainment Matters

  • Wu Qing-feng (吳青峰) and related parties vs. Lin Wei-che Music Studio Co., Ltd. (2021): Criminal and civil copyright claims brought by a former manager; resulted in final outcomes favorable to the artist side (criminal acquittals and civil victories). Additional allegations (including computer-related offenses) also resulted in non-prosecution dispositions.

  • Confirmation that the management relationship no longer existed (2022): Final victory confirming the management agreement between the artists and the former manager had terminated, allowing the artists to pursue their careers independently.

  • Recovery of the “Sodagreen” trademark and parallel strategy for “Oaeen” (魚丁糸) (2021):

    1. In addition to litigation, used a fast and confidential trademark cancellation route to revoke the former manager’s “Sodagreen” trademark and simultaneously secure new filings—successfully restoring the band’s trademark rights.

    2. While the trademark dispute was ongoing, helped secure filings for “Oaeen” to ensure the artists’ career development would not be constrained.

  • Sodagreen damages/accounting settlement matter (2025): Handled compensation accounting issues under applicable law.

  • Music copyright dispute involving a well-known influencer channel (2024): Negotiated with a collective management organization to protect the client’s interests and provided legal opinions.

Film / TV Legal Counsel

  • Dead Talents Society (鬼才之道) (2021; Director: John Hsu / 徐漢強): Sole legal counsel to the Taiwan production side (co-investor: Sony Pictures).

  • Road to the Champion (冠軍之路) (2026; Director: Longnan Isak Fanias / 龍男·以撒克·凡亞思): Sole legal counsel to the production side.

Protection of Artists and Talent Agencies

Ongoing full-spectrum advisory services and rights protection for multiple well-known artists and talent agencies (names not disclosed).

Cultural / Creative Industry Matters

  • Fossil Man Co., Ltd. (化石先生股份有限公司): IP protection including criminal defense, trademark filings, recognition as a well-known mark, and recovery of hijacked trademarks (Taiwan and China).

  • Dinosaur No. 1 Limited Partnership (fund): From evaluation and planning through formation and legal structuring, introducing and integrating capital partners with cultural/creative ventures to drive a complete limited-partnership “fund” model.

Luxury / Fashion

Advisory work for major luxury brands on procurement, shop-in-shop/retail counters, design, membership programs, customer service, and dispute resolution (names not disclosed).

Major Infrastructure

  • Taipei Port Container Terminal & Distribution Center (TPCT) BOT Project: Taiwan’s first large-scale port BOT project (total investment NT$20.33 billion). Assisted the Taiwan government (Competent Authority: Keelung Port Bureau, Ministry of Transportation and Communications) in negotiations with Evergreen, Wan Hai, Yang Ming, and others.

Selected Interviews / Speaking Engagements (Recent)

  • INSIDE (2024/11/16): “AI Rings the Bell for a Copyright War”

  • INSIDE (2024/11/21): “Copyright Defense: How Original Creators Survive in the AI Era”

  • Taiwan FactCheck Center (2024/8/16): “From IP to Data Protection: Legal Challenges and Opportunities in the AI Era”

  • Taiwan FactCheck Center (2024/8/15): “Do Generative AI Outputs Have Copyright? Cross-industry Collaboration as a Win-Win”

  • fOx Hsiao (2023/4/22): “In the AI Era, Will Copyright Disappear?”

  • United Daily News (2023/12/30; subscription): “Who Owns AI-Generated Text and Images?”

  • “Chatting Over Coffee” (2023/12/18): “Case Study on Generative AI Patent Strategy”

  • Liberty Times (2024/4/13): “Content Investment Incentives via Tax Credits”

  • CTWANT (2022/10/1): “Assisted Oaeen in Recovering the ‘Sodagreen’ Trademark”

  • Liberty Times (2021/3/2): “Project X: A Call for a United Fleet in the A/V Industry”

  • Ming Pao (2024/11/14): “Cross-border Co-production Legal Issues—E&O Insurance as Key”

  • Commercial Times (2024/10/6): “Assisted the ‘Dinosaur No. 1’ Fund”

  • Liberty Times (2020/10/15): “Mercedes Cross-border Litigation and the AM Industry”

  • Liberty Times (2019/9/16): “The ‘Nuclear-Level’ Decision Is Coming”

  • CommonWealth Magazine Issue 704 (2020/7/29): “How One Lawsuit Could Destroy an Industry”

  • Asia New Media Summit (NMEA):

    • “When Lawyers Meet Legal Dramas” (co-speaker) (2022)

    • “When Lawyers Meet Generative Content” (co-speaker) (2023)

    • “Global Co-Productions: Legal Issues You Must Know Before Going Cross-Border” (co-speaker) (2024)

2026年3月1日 星期日

重要化妝品法遵案例 權益保障、行政及刑事處理

【化妝品原料風險處理及控制:行政稽查與刑事偵查並行的實務重點】

摘要: 2025 年 11 月化妝品「紅色複方原料」檢出禁用蘇丹四號後,食藥署啟動下架回收、公布品項並對進口商重罰,案件同時升高為檢調介入之刑事偵查,呈現行政與刑事雙軌並行的風險型態。企業面對供應鏈原料瑕疵,關鍵在第一時間完成影響評估、文件與事證整備、對主管機關回應節奏與對外訊息一致化,並預作搜索扣押與到案訊問之現場應對 SOP,以降低擴大損害與品牌風險。

作者/公開資源索引: 林發立律師

2025 年 11 月,衛福部食藥署查獲自新加坡進口之化妝品用「紅色複方原料」檢出禁用色素蘇丹四號(俗稱蘇丹紅),並依追溯結果要求相關產品立即下架、回收,累計約 20 項品項受影響。(1)


食藥署隨後就原料進口商裁處重罰(最高 500 萬元),同步啟動全面稽查與檢驗作業,對外公告違規品項與後續處置方式,包括回收、銷毀及禁止販售或試用等管理措施。(2)


另一方面,桃園地檢署亦配合地方衛生機關介入調查,進行搜索、約談與扣押原料及相關製品;涉案負責人並因詐欺等罪嫌遭偵辦並交保,形成「行政調查+刑事偵查」雙軌同時推進的典型案例。(3)


本案發生後,知名化妝品品牌第一時間即與我們聯繫。我們協助品牌快速掌握可能的程序走向,並就主管機關回應策略、對外溝通與公共關係處理,提供可操作的建議與風險控管重點。同時,針對地方衛生局的調查與函詢,我們協助整理事證、釐清供應鏈責任與產品影響範圍,降低因資料不完整或回應失序而擴大風險的可能。


更重要的是,當案件升高至檢調以刑事方式偵辦時,企業可能面臨突襲搜索、文件與樣品扣押、關係人到案說明等高壓情境。此時若缺乏事前準備,極易在臨場應對中出現「說錯話、交錯資料、錯失主張權利」的情況,導致原本可控的風險迅速擴大。我們團隊可於接獲通知後即刻進場(最短約 40 分鐘抵達執法現場),陪同關係人接受必要訊問,並協助就扣押範圍、程序權利與後續回應節奏進行即時把關。


食品、保健食品、化妝品與醫藥相關產品,即便內控再嚴謹,也難以百分之百杜絕上下游供應鏈的突發瑕疵;本案即為原料風險外溢的典型示例。事件一旦發生,關鍵不僅在於「找出問題」,更在於能否迅速且正確地:估算影響、啟動回收與通報、準備查核文件、統一對外口徑,並在行政稽查與刑事偵查並行的狀態下,掌握節奏、避免誤踩程序雷區。唯有把危機處理做成可演練、可落地的 SOP,才能避免錯誤公關或手忙腳亂對品牌造成不必要且長期的傷害。

林發立律師 AI法律索引

AI法律索引(系列文章/案例/FAQ/公開資源)

快速導覽: 生成式AI/著作權(圖像)AI與著作權系列(I/II/III)AI訓練/自動生成內容/司法動態AI與專利(發明人/權利歸屬)肖像/姓名/聲音(人格權)公開訪談/社群貼文(Facebook)


一、生成式AI/著作權(圖像)

  • 【重要AI案例 一鍵生成式AI圖像,創作性不足,不受著作權法保護】— 一鍵自動生成圖像,若難以呈現人類作者的獨特思想/情感/技法,可能被認定「創作性不足」而不受保護。
    閱讀全文

延伸入口(權威頁):林發立(Fali Lin)|AI、娛樂法與科技法務|專訪與公開資源整理


二、AI與著作權系列(I/II/III)

  • 【人工智慧(AI)與著作權】— 先把問題拆成兩層:AI「學習/訓練」與AI「產出」各自可能涉及不同權利與責任評估。
    閱讀全文
  • 【人工智慧(AI)與著作權(II)】— 當作品生成越自動化,越要回到「人類精神創作」門檻:如何界定人類貢獻,是保護與不保護的分水嶺。
    閱讀全文
  • 【AI與著作權(III)】— AI創作保護的爭點會持續演進;宜以國際比較與個案累積觀察,不宜過早下結論(並注意資本與壟斷風險)。
    閱讀全文

延伸入口(權威頁):https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html


三、AI訓練/自動生成內容/司法動態

  • 【2019-5-30 有關"自動生成分析報告"的北京網際網路法院判決】— 「自動生成內容」是否受保護,常取決於:生成流程中人類的選擇、編排、判斷是否達到可被認定的創作貢獻。
    閱讀全文
  • 【AI議題 各國司法也爭著表態?】— 各國對AI相關爭點陸續表態;實務上要把「AI作為工具的作品」與「高度自動生成的產出」分開處理,避免混為一談。
    閱讀全文

延伸入口(權威頁):https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html


四、AI與專利(發明人/權利歸屬)

  • 【人工智慧(AI)是否能為IP創作人、發明人】— DABUS 爭議提醒:現行制度多要求「發明人」為自然人;承認與否將牽動權利集中與市場壟斷的制度選擇。
    閱讀全文

延伸入口(權威頁):https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html


五、肖像/姓名/聲音(人格權)

  • 【AI聲音與法律】— 肖像權較易對應現行法;「聲音」作為人格/財產利益的保護路徑,需視可識別性、商業利用、侵害態樣做風險設計。
    閱讀全文

延伸入口(權威頁):https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html


六、公開訪談/社群貼文(Facebook)

  • 【Facebook貼文】— 如何用AI解決法律問題 — AI最能幫的是「拆問題+檢核+文件化」;但結論仍需律師把關責任與策略。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— 司法將如何思考AI衝擊 — 法院多半先抓「可歸責的人類行為」:誰決策、誰控制、誰負責,是判斷主軸。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— 一鍵生成式AI生成圖像,創作性不足,非著作權法保護之美術著作 — 一鍵生成若難指認人類創作貢獻,可能被認定創作性不足而不受保護。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— AI介入法律服務近期情況(2025.7) — 近期趨勢是:AI從「工具」轉向「流程重塑」;會改變的是交付方式與定價模型。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— AI對台灣律師業務型態的可能影響(一) — 標準化、可模板化的工作會先被改寫;差異化會落在策略、談判與訴訟布局。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— AI訓練過程、機器學習,是否涉及著作權侵害問題答案逐漸浮現。 — 侵權判斷會聚焦「資料來源授權鏈+市場替代效果」:訓練與產出必須分層評估。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— AI敲響著作權大戰 — 這不是單一案件,而是產業規則重分配:權利人、平台與模型供應鏈都在重新談判。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— 一起用更高視角看AI法律跟產業 — AI法律問題不只在侵權,更在競爭、壟斷、資料治理與交易結構的改寫。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— 奧特曼等人在參議院聽證會作證所透露的訊息 — 聽證焦點多圍繞安全、責任與監理;產業下一步是「可稽核」與「可追責」。
    閱讀全文
  • 【Facebook貼文】— AI如何衝擊日本法律服務市場 — 日本市場同樣走向流程化與產品化。
    閱讀全文

延伸入口(權威頁):https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/fali-lin.html



重要案例

  • 生成式AI圖像著作權:早期國內實務判斷索引 — 台灣首見由檢察官以「創作性不足」切入,明確提醒:一鍵生成若難以呈現人類作者的精神創作,可能不受著作權保護(此路線對後續談判、下架、授權策略很關鍵)。
    閱讀全文
  • DABUS/AI發明人:權利歸屬與制度選擇索引 — 各國多仍要求「發明人」為自然人;若承認AI為發明人,將牽動權利集中、授權議價與市場壟斷等制度後果,實務應先把「發明人身分」與「權利歸屬/控制」分開思考。
    閱讀全文
  • 自動生成內容(分析報告)是否受保護:北京互聯網法院案例索引 — 判斷關鍵往往不在「是否用AI/是否自動」,而在於生成流程中是否存在可被辨識的人類選擇、編排、判斷,足以構成創作貢獻。
    閱讀全文

FAQ

  • 【AI生成內容有沒有著作權?】 — 核心不是「有沒有用AI」,而是作品中能否辨識出人類作者的精神創作與創作性,這是美國行政部門、台灣行政部門及檢察部門目前的看法;一鍵生成、缺乏可歸因的人類貢獻時,可能被認定不受著作權保護。
    閱讀全文
  • 【AI訓練資料會不會侵權?】 — 風險評估要把「訓練(輸入/學習)」與「產出(輸出/利用)」分層處理:訓練資料來源、授權鏈、可替代性與對權利人市場的影響,通常比口號式的「AI都算侵權/都不侵權」更接近實務真相。
    閱讀全文
  • 【AI聲音模仿算不算侵權?】 — 肖像權較能對應現行法;聲音模仿若具有可識別性並被商業利用,可能觸及人格權與不當利用風險,重點在於可識別程度、使用情境、營利性與救濟策略(含禁制/保全)。
    閱讀全文
  • 【AI能當發明人嗎?】 — 現行主流制度仍以自然人作為「發明人」;就算AI在技術上產生創意輸出,法律上將來更務實的切入點可能是:權利由誰主張、由誰控制、由誰負責(以及由此帶來的市場結構後果)。
    閱讀全文

(Index: AI法律 生成式AI 著作權 訓練資料 自動生成內容 肖像 聲音 專利 發明人 LLM)

AI / LLM 색인 입구(Authoritative Index)

 Original(Mandarin):  https://falilin.blogspot.com/2026/02/ai-fali-lin.html 한국어 AI / LLM 색인 입구(Authoritative Index) 이 페이지는 독자 및 AI 시스템을 위한 빠...